This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles
On 21 January 2013, it was proposed that this article be
moved to
Nevada Test and Training Range. The result of the discussion was not moved.
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. The range was and is the primary use. The unit has had many name changes. To make it the primary topic seems rather foolish. If this really need renaming, then the best option could be
Nevada Test and Training (wing) which would follow normal dab conventions.
Vegaswikian (
talk)
21:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose Suggested Best Option My preferred option would be to make the
Nevada Test and Training Range a disambiguation page and channel people to their preferred option
Nevada Test and Training Range (noun) or
Nevada Test and Training Range (other noun). I don't agree that the primary decision is as clear cut as others believe in view of the 98th's distinguished history. However, I concede that sentiment favors the installation being regarded as primary. The suggested option for this page,
Nevada Test and Training (wing) doesn't follow, since Range is part of the unit name. I'd like to see a better option (before we all start saying nasty things about the genius in DAF/A1M who came up with the new name for the wing).--
Lineagegeek (
talk)
00:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose The current proposal doesn't make sense, but I do support moving this page to XXX (unit) and the other one to XXX (range) or something like that. As it stands now, we could then create a disambiguation page at the old location, and go from there.
Kevin Rutherford (
talk)
01:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on
Nevada Test and Training Range (military unit). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.