From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nevada Gaming Commission v State Gaming Control Board

Can someone update this article to explain why we have both of these related orginizations? I think we need two articles since there are links for both and they do have votes in what gets approved. Vegaswikian 05:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC) reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nevada Gaming Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC) reply

History of its name

Google turns up awful lot of references in books from the 1960s and even long after, to the "Nevada Gambling Commission." Was that the Commission's original name? If so, when did the name change (presumably by legislation) to "Nevada Gaming Commission"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.178.22 ( talk) 16:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Is it copyvio?

A LTA has been repeatedly removing material from the page claiming it was a copyright violation. While WP:BMB and the person who reverted them was very much justified in doing so, the underlying issue might be less obvious.
The original text was added with the edit summary added text from book: History of Canada[sic] and in this way exact article is more complete and informative, citing the 1987 book History of Nevada as a reference. While I don't have access to the book and cannot confirm whether the text does indeed match, the book's date of publication (first edition in 1973) means it is likely still copyrighted. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 21:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC) reply