This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Neurobioengineering' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide
Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles
For more information and how you can help click Show:
If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page for more details.
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see
navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see
info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the
list of transhumanism articles
Maintenance / Etc
Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see
citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be
neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see
deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see
transhumanism articles)
Clarify references in
Transhumanism, using footnotes.
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Neurobioengineering. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The title of this article implied to me that it should focus on the "neruobioengineering" discipline of bioengineering. However, the article as it is currently written is entierly about the neurobioengineering program at the University of Genova. Should the article be rewritten to focus more on the broader topic than the one college program? If not, is the topic of this article notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page?
22alia (
talk)
01:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I agree wholeheartedly, thank you for bringing this up!
Having the article focus on the program rather than the discipline is inappropriate, and the discipline itself would not meet notability criteria on its own either: a search of the term neurobioengineering yields no significant results on
PubMed and no hits on
Google Books, and even Google searches show only a handful of original results repeated in different contexts without much prevalence. I think the discipline of neurobioengineering would therefore be better described as a subfield of other areas in Wikipedia (
Biological engineering,
Biomedical engineering,
Neural tissue engineering and/or
Neural engineering) but would not merit an article of its own.
Since no one else seems to have disagreed with the notability issue you have raised in this discussion, I am going to
blank and redirect neurobioengineering to neural engineering at least for now.
If someone believes these two are sufficiently distinct and would like to dissociate the field of neurobioengineering from neural engineering, please make sure to add evidence of
notability to avoid excessive overlap between articles.
Cffisac (
talk)
02:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply