This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Netlify article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 21 April 2021. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Tonight I was suggesting to someone that if they wanted to get started with building a website with JavaScript, they should check out the "Jamstack" way of developing sites. I naturally looked here in Wikipedia and was surprised to find only a redirect to the Netlify page with just a paragraph about "Jamstack". While developers at Netlify came up with the term "Jamstack" and started using it, the term is now widely used within the web development world. jamstack.org lists the many site generators and headless CMS's that support "jamstack" development. There are numerous articles in reliable sources, and multiple books now available. It feels to me like there should be a separate article specifically about Jamstack. Thoughts? Opinions? - Dyork ( talk) 00:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
The section "Reception" quotes from a Netlify press release. A press release does not qualify as a reliable source. I'm going to delete the quote. Longitude2 ( talk) 10:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)