This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Valid and reasoned criticism is fine (as pertains to article editing) but this stuff is neither and should be removed.
Sean7phil ( talk) 02:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Should anybody say that Neil Clark Warren is a con artist since me and some other fans think it is immoral to charge money for a dating service? (unsigned comment from anon)
As a 50+ male seeking the love of my life I completed the eHarmony self-quiz thingy and it found me one supposedly suitable match: it was Neil Clark Warren. I feel so dirty. 68.13.60.210 ( talk) 17:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
eHarmony is an excuse to discriminate on religious basis. He should be sued. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.240.11 ( talk) 05:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
This article is nothing but PR fluff Proxy User ( talk) 23:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
" ... offered seminars and teaching tools based on the wisdom from Warren’s books ... the first and only compatibility matching service ..."
This is unadulterated marketing hype! A.T.S. in Texas ( talk) 14:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
I just made some edits to try and clean the article up a bit. There was too much repetition, unnecessary quotes, and flowery language. It still needs a lot of work, but I think this improves it somewhat. - 68.51.33.90 ( talk) 17:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Not sure where this belongs, but Wikipedia -- while I believe it is a great idea -- has its own credibility problems. Among other things, it certainly shouldn't allow itself to be used as a billboard for a bigoted matchmaker who looks like a cross between Orville Reddenbacher and Grant Wood's farmer with the pitchfork. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.194.177.218 ( talk) 05:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
I think we should find another source to justify the seven thousand interview bit, else it sounds like marketing fluff. Doing 7,000 interviews in one's life would be a damn challenge. If you could somehow maintain doing an interview a day, you'd have do do one, every day, for 19 years and 65 days? Sound legit? Not so sure.... Needs more rigorous citation so it doesn't sound like bs fluffery.....
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neil Clark Warren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)