This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Here's some ideas of things to add to the page, most of them were taken from the NG boards thread about the wiki entry
Saturnin55 12:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Looks like the hissy-fit that got it set up for deletion wound up instead giving it a whole lot of attention, leading the article to being vastly improved. :)
I've come to this page several times looking for information on the Tome of Horrors and its legality/canonicity regarding the mainstream of D&D.
According to Jared von Hindman of headinjurytheater.com, "Last time, I mistakenly thought...the Tome of Horror was an official D&D product. It sort of was....only it wasn't. ...here are two monsters from later editions of Tome of Horrors. They're for Dungeons & Dragons, only they're not official. Sort of. The Geeks out there know the score and understand what I'm saying here. Also the Wizard of the Coast lawyers understand it just as well."
I may be a Geek (capitalized, even!), but I don't know the score; does anyone understand the situation? Wizards of the Coast Lawyers, care to explain?
Wpell (
talk)
13:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Necromancer Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Necromancer Games's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "designers":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)