This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Image:Nauticalogo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
fair use but there is no
explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
fair use.
Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a
fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
The company "Nautica" was founded in 1983. In 1999 the company created a subsidiary company called "Nautica Jeans" WRobertson 01:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wrobertson (
talk •
contribs)
Peacocking by anon user
Apparently semi-protection was ineffective at preventing a particular anon user from disruptively adding peacock terms to the article, since the user has since returned. Semi-premium is a fair and accurate descriptor for the brand, since it is generally priced above mid-range brands such as IZOD and Chaps, but below premium brands such as Tommy Hilfiger and Polo Ralph Lauren. The fashion industry has different segments, although while subjective, the most common segments are economy, mid-range, premium, and luxury. IZOD and Chaps fall under mid-range, while Tommy Hilfiger and Polo Ralph Lauren fall under premium. Since Nautica doesn't clearly fit in neither mid-range nor premium, semi-premium I think is a good way to describe the brand.
ANDROS1337TALK23:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Requested move 26 July 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support 1st, oppose 2nd Per
WP:TWODABS, the disambiguation page should simply be deleted (or at least, swapped with the clothing company), not moved elsewhere. A hatnote is sufficient.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
07:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
To add to article
To add to this article: even a single image of an article of Nautica-brand clothing. How can we consider our project encyclopedic if we're lacking something this basic?
76.190.213.189 (
talk)
01:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply