This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Natural Bridge (Virginia) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ok, i know this is considered one of the natural wounders of the world. but anyone know why its not listed on this page.-- ZeWrestler Talk 01:16, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Fixed using information from this page [1]
I've heard that you can't see anything from US 11 due to commercialization. Is this true? -- NE2 18:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
It is actually so high and abrupt a turn on Rt 11 that it has been necessary to install Fencing alongside this portion of the road.
Yes. Dating back to at least the early 1970s, a tall fence consisting of vertical wooden slats prevents motorists on US 11 from seeing anything. Of course, from atop the bridge there's not much to view, and the passage is narrow so there's no room for gawkers (who would probably obstruct traffic.) I doubt that the fence is there entirely due to commercialization. Scott Johnson 18:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Why Does the town of Natural Bridge, Virginia redirect here? The "natural wonder" is a place in the town. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.127.98.70 ( talk) 22:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I walked U.S Route 11 in September of 2008. Route 11 does not run on top of the Natural Bridge. The Natural Bridge is not visible from Route 11. A billboard and some fence blocks the view. -- DwayneP ( talk) 21:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
I guess I am not sure I understand why my link to my article Other Attractions in Virginia Near the Natural Bridge Area was removed & why it does not meet the guidelines. I live in Virginia, I visit Natural Bridge a few times of year and it is a wonderful area. I actually went to Natural Bridge several times before I found other attractions in the area. The article is not an ad, promotion or a way to get external links to increase my page rank it is an link to an article I wrote about other attractions that I have visited in the Natural Bridge area. It's about fun things to do besides go to the Natural Bridge. Could some body please explain to me how & why it is not relevant? Lacurcio 18:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Can you swim in the water beside the natural bridge? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.132.104.57 ( talk) 21:24, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
http://hamptonroads.com/2013/05/jeffersons-prized-natural-bridge-sale
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/24/natural-bridge-for-sale_n_3332505.html
http://www.roanoke.com/news/1952312-12/natural-bridge-its-nearby-attractions-are-up-for.html
bridge is up for sale ( as of may 2013 ) - please add to wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.35.82 ( talk) 18:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Natural Bridge sold, on path to become state park (Feb 6, 2014 Roanoke Times)
http://www.roanoke.com/news/article_2f71eb7c-8f5a-11e3-8599-0017a43b2370.html
Significant Information, please update article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.48.52.231 ( talk) 21:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Natural Bridge (Virginia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:07, 8 December 2018 (UTC)