This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
I learned from
User:Acroterion at my talk page that North Dakota (along with Alaska, Connecticut, North Carolina) now has NRHP nomination documents available at the National Park Service's NPS Focus webpage (try
this NPS Focus interface. Should make it easier to develop NRHP articles, thot y'all would like to know. :)
doncram (
talk)
08:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I have just added archive links to one external link on
National Register of Historic Places listings in North Dakota. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The state has three main regions, the Red River Valley, the Drift Prairie, and the Missouri Plateau (which includes Badlands subarea), per the Wikipedia article
Geography of North Dakota and various external sources, including
ND Geography and
North Dakota Studies.GOV. These regions provide basis to divide the NRHP listings into three geographically coherent clumps. This current list-article, instead, appends together, randomly, the counties which are "smaller" by number of NRHP listings contained. Thus the map of counties covered here is random, with random holes where "bigger" counties are omitted. --
Doncram (
talk)
00:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Having noted the three regions in the table of this article, I see that the 3 regions divide the NRHP listings into about 160, 140, 100 listings apiece, which is fine. Therefore the separate county list-articles and this big list-article currently covering the "smaller" counties can be reorganized into three regions. I will plan to leave this open for comments, and if there aren't any objections I will plan to proceed and implement the reorganization. The main reason is to serve readers better, of course. Readers be able to see commonalities of types of listings within each of the three regions. For example the economy along the Red River valley may be different, and architects/builders working along that valley, and the clay soil characteristic of the region may lead to commonalities in types of structures and ultimately NRHP listings. I hope and expect editors, including myself, can appropriately call attention to commonalities within lede sections of each of the three list-articles. --
Doncram (
talk)
01:28, 11 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Note, further that the three NRHP listings which are "duplicates", i.e. which span across two counties, cause no difficulties. Each of those pairs of counties are within just one region, each.
Ridge Trail Historic District, listed in both Walsh and Pembina counties, is wholly within Red River Valley region.
Fort Union Trading Post National Historic Site, listed in both McKenzie and Williams counties (as well as Richland and Roosevelt counties, Montana), is wholly within the Missouri Plateau region.
Custer Military Trail Historic Archaeological District is listed in Billings and Golden Valley counties, is also wholly within the Missouri Plateau region. So there is no complication in presentation from the grouping. --
Doncram (
talk)
01:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)reply
There was
previous discussion in 2017 which i opened, advocating use of 6 tourist regions, not generally liked, though I did not understand reasons for objecting, or sarcasm. 3 geographical regions with 160, 140, 100 or so listings seems fine. --
Doncram (
talk)
21:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply