This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Changed some of FreeRangeFrog's edits
here. As far as I can tell, no one but DeLong-Bas (and I guess the student newspaper of the university where she works) claims
Asharq Al-Awsat misquoted her, so it seems right to just state the facts ("DeLong-Bas was quoted ... A month later in the Brandeis University’s student newspaper The Justice she disputed the quote"), rather than state her claim as a fact ("DeLong-Bas was misquoted").
Another minor point, Stephen Suleyman Schwartz seems to have conservative connections, Michael J. Ybarra worked for the
Wall Street Journal but was not bad mouthing
MESA or otherwise involved in ideological disputes, as far as I can tell. --
BoogaLouie (
talk)
23:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)reply
@
BoogaLouie: I think that's fine. I just really wanted to add the subsequent correction by DeLong-Bas to her quote. I'm not sure if it's an attempt at damage control or she was really misquoted, but either way we have to say what the sources say. Thanks. §
FreeRangeFrogcroak23:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Historical revisionism?
It's worth noting that this article is that of a historical revisionist. Irrespective of her academic work in the middle east, her ground view on Wahhabi entirely overlooks the following;
Ibn Abd al-Wahhab described followers of both the Christian and Jewish faiths as sorcerers who believed in devil worship, and cited a hadith of the prophet stating that punishment for the sorcerer is `that he be struck with the sword.`[56] Wahhab asserted that both religions had improperly made the graves of their prophet into places of worship and warned Muslims not to imitate this practice.[57] Wahhab concluded that `The ways of the people of the book are condemned as those of polytheists.`[58]
It appears the mysterious agenda of 'people of the book' living in peace is a fabrication of the delusional mind of a cultural marxist / cultural relativist. In the interest of neutrality, perhaps the editors of this article could attempt to bring this article more in line with reality?
121.211.33.244 (
talk)
20:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
POV fork
An earlier version of reception for Wahhabi Islam (
[1]) mentioned 3 positive assessment from book reviews with inline quotes, and 4 negative assessments with inline quotes (one from the same book review and the rest from quoted comments). This version has been moved to another article, and what's left here mentioned one positive review without quoting it, while quoting all 4 negative assessments, some with a more prominent quote template. This is an unjustified change of relative weight, leading to a
WP:POVFORK.
Eperoton (
talk)
02:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)reply
I didn't realise that the article had been split, so I assumed that you were removing well cited material. That said, I was only able to trace 2 positive reviews. The first to
Middles East Journal and the second to
Washington Report. The third positive review is linked to
this link and does not appear to show anything positive about the book unless I have missed something.
On the other hand there does appear to be 5 negative reviews in the article. This would indicate that more prominence should be given to the negative reviews per
WP:BALANCE. Also, other academics have criticised the book in
this article such as Ahmad Dallal, who is a professor of Arabic at Georgetown University.
MontyKind (
talk)
06:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)reply
There was more of them, and the question is also how they're presented. Creating a balanced summary of reception with contradictory reviews is hard. Sometimes, it needs to be done for the lead (and is liable to result in long disputes). In this case, it wasn't necessary to create this NPOV challenge. The article on the book started with a lengthy book report which keeps getting removed and restored, but the section on this book here stands on its own and is not unreasonably long, since it's by far the author's most prominent -- and controversial -- publication. I'll restore the original text (plus your additions), and if someone cares enough about its length to debate an abridgment, we can have that discussion and try to design a NPOV rationale for it.
Eperoton (
talk)
22:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)reply
IP Editor deletion of cited text
An IP editor objects to the following:
DeLong-Bas has expressed the view that there is too much negativity towards Wahhabism in the West, and in her writings has argued that
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was "not the godfather of contemporary terrorist movements", but
"a voice of reform, reflecting mainstream eighteenth-century Islamic thought. His vision of Islamic society was based upon monotheism in which Muslims, Christians, and Jews were to enjoy peaceful co-existence and cooperative commercial treaty relations."[1][2]
DeLong-Bas believes that extremism in Saudi Arabia "does not stem from" Islam, but from issues such as oppression of the Palestinian people, "Iraq, and the American government's tying [the hands of] the U.N. [and preventing it] from adopting any resolution against Israel, have definitely added to the Muslim youth's state of frustration."[2]
In an December 21, 2006 interview in the
London daily Asharq Al-Awsat, DeLong-Bas was quoted[3] as stating that she did "...not find any evidence that would make me agree that
Osama bin Laden was behind the
Attack on the Twin Towers".[2] A month later in The Justice—the student newspaper of Brandeis University (where she was teaching at the time) -- she disputed the quote, stating: "Of course he did. He's the CEO of Al-Qaeda and the leader of their political agenda. All I claimed was that he didn't have anything to do with the logistics or the planning of the attacks themselves."[3]
^"Wahhabi Islam". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
^
abHerman, Bernard (January 23, 2007).
"Culture and Controversy". TheJustice.org. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
The version the IP editor would prefer is as follows:
DeLong-Bas has expressed the view that there is significant misinformation about Wahhabism in the West, and in her writings has argued that its founder,
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was "not the godfather of contemporary terrorist movements", but
"a voice of reform, reflecting mainstream eighteenth-century Islamic thought. His vision of Islamic society was based upon monotheism in which Muslims, Christians, and Jews were to enjoy peaceful co-existence and cooperative commercial treaty relations."[1]
DeLong-Bas believes that extremism in Saudi Arabia "does not stem from" Islam, but from a variety of issues both domestic and international.
In an December 21, 2006 interview in the
London daily Asharq Al-Awsat, DeLong-Bas was misquoted[2] as stating that she did "...not find any evidence that would make me agree that
Osama bin Laden was behind the
Attack on the Twin Towers".[3] Confirming that Bin Laden knew of the attacks, but did not personally plan them, she asserted a month later in The Justice—the student newspaper at Brandeis University : "He's the CEO of Al-Qaeda and the leader of their political agenda. All I claimed was that he didn't have anything to do with the logistics or the planning of the attacks themselves."[2]
^"Wahhabi Islam". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
^
abHerman, Bernard (January 23, 2007).
"Culture and Controversy". TheJustice.org. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
^Cite error: The named reference IDOM was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).
Please could the IP editor explain how sources support their version. Wikipedia has a policy
WP:Verify. So if statements are not supported by sources, they must be deleted. Toddy1(talk)22:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply