This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nasty woman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should this page simply be called " Nasty woman"? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Can someone identify specifically why the 'original research' tag appears at the top of the article? I don't think it's necessary and will remove it unless someone can explains its inclusion. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Page is written as though Trump coined this term. Usage in the sense of "empowered woman," "she-who-leans-in," " Fearless Girl," and so forth needs to be properly written up, with a history of the origin and and secondary sources explicating the meaning. See WP:NEO. But it also needs context. Among the doubts in re: notability at the recent AfD is the question of whether the use of two common English words in this way is a distinctive and meaningful neologism, or simply a juxtaposition of two words "nasty" and "woman" both of which have shifted meaning over time. Article will need editing to shed its rather intense presentism and reflect previous, relatively stable specific meanings of the phrase ("woman who is physically dirty in her habits; woman who is a vile person; woman who enjoys or is willing to engage in sex; there may be others) this can go in a history section. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 09:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I wonder if the best disposition might be a redirect to Reappropriation#Sex and sexuality. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 09:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Students in my WikiEdu course New Literacies, Cultures and Technologies of Writing created an article this semester, Nasty Woman Movement. There's obvious overlap with your work on this page. Would you be interested in merging your article with theirs or vice versa? My students have completed the assignment, but I did ask if any of them would want to help with the merge. They will reply here if they're interested. Tokyogirl79 was our assigned WikiEd staff member. Aschuet1 ( talk) 16:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
The phrase isn't independently notable, merging this with Women's March (where it got the most use) seems logical. Thoughts? Jdcomix ( talk) 11:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Nasty guy. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21#Nasty guy until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
PepperBeast
(talk)
23:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)