I will be doing this, but I'm a little busy due to real-life activities, so it may take a while for me to finish this review. All I can say though is so far so good: I'm not really seeing many problems with the article. Just a suggestion though: can at least some Japanese reviews be included in the article? You know, from sources like Famitsu and others.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew05:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
I can't read Japanese, but a fellow user added Japanese sources to development of the article,
@
Narutolovehinata5 and
Tintor2: After a request from Tintor2, I've included Famitsu's review, in addition to comments from the reviewers as part of the prose. I also corrected a minor formatting error by Tintor2 when including his original Famitsu score reference. --
ProtoDrake (
talk)
16:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
A few typos and missing spaces (and in at least one case, an extra space) here and there. There are also inconsistent tenses throughout. Also, try replacing the word "good" with a more specific synonym whenever possible.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew07:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Tintor2:@
ProtoDrake: The following sentence does not have a citation: "Clearing the story mode unlocks an additional "fragment" chapter detailing Sasuke's team's failed capture of Killer Bee, following their alliance with Akatsuki." This is the last issue that needs to be addressed before the nomination passes.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew00:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)reply