This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I oppose the proposal of Piotrus. By using this approach, we would then have to rename
Białowieża Forest to "Belovezhskaya Pushcha"
[1]. For users not familiar with German von Muskau is clearer than adjective MuskauerJanSuchy19:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)reply
I support the proposal, Google results for "Park von Muskau" yield only 66 results compared to 26,300 for "Muskauer Park". Moreover as previously stated the official name as listed on the website is Muskauer Park / Park Muzakowski
[2]JRWalko19:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I think the sentence an exemplary example of cross-border cultural collaboration between Poland and Germany should be removed. It is absurd as the park was created in 1815, when the area was right in the middle of the the Kingdom of Prussia, and Poland did not exist politically. --
Rodemont2
I believe that UNESCO is referring to the modern day efforts of park operation. Both countries are participating in the restoration of buildings and the maintenance of the park. The park has changed a lot in recent years through these efforts.
JRWalko15:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I have just modified one external link on
Muskau Park. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.