This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 2 April 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment. It seems to be referred to interchangeably as the Mujahid Force, Mujahid Force Regiment and Mujahid Regiment. As far as I can see, none is more common than the others. --
Necrothesp (
talk)
13:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The two IPs supporting the move above seem likely to be the same editor. The editor who proposed the move gave a few citations, but did not give any data on which name is more common in reliable secondary sources, and has not followed up after the relisting comment. I would read the current state of the discussion as no case to answer, leading to a "no consensus to move" close, but since no one has actually opposed the move I'll refrain from closing it that way now.
Dekimasuよ!14:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose. As Dekimasu says, no case to answer. Nom seems to have no grasp of the issues in terms of
WP:AT. There seem to be three possible article names,
Mujahid Force Regiment,
Mujahid Force and
Mujahid Regiment. As none of these three are ambiguous, the current name is
trivially more concise than the proposed name and it is hard to see any possible justification for extending it. The two redirects already exist, if either did not not I would just create it.
Andrewa (
talk)
15:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Pakistan Today, March 21, 2021, Preparations in full swing to celebrate Pakistan Day in befitting manner on Mar 23: Rawalpindi CTP finalises all the arrangements to facilitate the motorists of twin cities on March 23