This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This stub article is NOT 'Wikified'. It has v basic problems of language and style apart from poor and few refs/citations
39.54.68.70 (
talk)
08:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Col Mumtaz Khanreply
Inappropriate tone
The tone is still not appropriate content like “He was the individual who had the esteemed privilege of being the first to receive the honor of pledging allegiance to Shah Fakhar-u-Din” and “To his followers he was venerated by the honorific title 'Qibla Alam', signifying an elevated spiritual status within the Islamic mystical tradition” and “Maulana Fakhruddin's remarkable benevolence deeply moved him” is not neutral tone.
Theroadislong (
talk)
14:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Requested move 24 June 2024
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Muhammad Maharvi → Khawaja Noor Muhammad Maharvi – i know it seems a bit long but i think i would be perfect fit because its the correct name the "Maharvi on the original page is not even a name is just shows the locality of that person as cited. Moreover the Noor Muhammad name is already taken so i think its the only correct choice to use that name
Alragon1 (
talk) 12:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (
permalink).
Rotideypoc41352 (
talk·contribs)
15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Before I do that, let me add some context for other people looking at this discussion. This
had been declined at
WP:RMT before Amakuru. I've copied the discussion there into the collapsible box below for convenience:
Hi, I think its necessary for a person to have a correct name to stop it from being controversial, The prefix Khawaja is used in many instances even though Maharvi is not even a name its a suffix.
The Correct Name would be Khawaja (prefix) + Noor Muhmmad (name) + Maharvi (suffix) and moreover its a very common name in this region so there should be no problem for anyone to change it.
Alragon1 (
talk)
05:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)reply
It is just an honrific prefix and I'd just decline it but I guess Noor Muhammad Maharvi is more close to their common name than just Muhammad Maharvi. ─
Aafī(talk)05:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Moreover as the user:
Aafī suggested, my position is the name should be Khawaja Noor Muhammad Maharvi Instead of Muhammad Maharvi [1] as was proposed in RMT discussion i have also a reference that word Khawaja had already been used e.g.
Khawaja Suleman Taunsvi Alragon1 (
talk)
15:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't seem to find any such huge usage in English language resources that establish this "rareness" for this article title. We are left with only two options: either Muhammad Maharvi (as it is) or Noor Muhammad Maharvi. For
Khawaja Suleman Taunsvi, the common name is "Suleman Taunsvi". An article existing with an honorific prefix should not be a reason to be another article to a name that doesn't follow the community guidelines. Regards, signed, Aafi (talk)17:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Noor Muhammad Maharvi is better because Maharvi is a prefix showing locality of the person as he lived in village Mahar Sharif.
Alragon1 (
talk)
18:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.