A fact from Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction – Kanpur section appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 June 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
I have just modified one external link on
Mughalsarai–Kanpur section. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 5 external links on
Mughalsarai–Kanpur section. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose : News sources for the time frame 1 July 2018 (after name change) to 1 July 2023 on "Mughalsarai–Kanpur section" using quotes gets me
1 hit, while "Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Jn - Kanpur section" gets me
ZERO (NO RESULTS FOUND). Same with "Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Jn - Kanpur section"
ZERO results -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
21:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)reply
There are currently move discussions for: (1) the town of Mughalsarai
(see move discussion), (2) Mughalsarai's railway station
(see move discussion), and (3) at least one route from Mughalsarai's railway station (the present move discussion). In my opinion, it would be best to resolve these in the order: 1st the name of the town, 2nd the name of the town's railway station, and 3rd the name of articles on routes to/from the railway station. In my opinion, the decision on (1) impacts on what is the best decision for (2), and the decisions on (1) and (2) impact on what is the best decision for (3).
Part of this is about whether to include the "Mughalsarai" name in the article title. Part of this is how to write the new name in English - unless there is a good reason not to, we should standardise on either "Deendayal" or "Deen Dayal" (what been proposed is that the station should use "Deen Dayal", but the town "Deendayal"). --
Toddy1(talk)09:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I have changed my mind. As far as I am aware, there is no current
commonly-used English name for this railway section. We know of a name used in an official document for this section. There is also merit it retaining the current article name because it uses the commonly-used English names for towns at either end of the section, and is therefore is easy to understand.
(CNB-DDU) is just the abbreviated codes of the two station names. Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction - Kanpur section seems like the right choice here, since names of stations would be preferred over the names of towns.
Captain Jack Sparrow (
talk)
16:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Anubhavklal: I don't get it why you keep changing the target article. Last time you tried to unilaterally move it to "Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Jn –Kanpur section", now "Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Jn - Kanpur section". Not only it is difficult to verify which version to check for, it looks like you are trying to game the system. Stick to one version only. Your other move requests are also like that and so was your moves last few days. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
18:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Not clear what you mean by "target" article. Is there a rule that one can make only one request at a time? Should we not work together to make entire Wikipedia useful?
Anubhavklal (
talk)
19:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Anubhavklal: Target article is name you are suggesting. You are changing it often, as if choosing from a list. The article will be moved to a single 'name space' that you mention above, not forked into multiple versions of it. And what's with the − "Should we not work together to make entire Wikipedia useful"? I see this in most of your comments? -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
19:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Who says consensus is not required, but you need to be specific. Moving pages is a complex process. Very well, I check for this specific version. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
20:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Now it is 7 days and only one person has objection. So how to reach consensus? @
admin
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Official name
HI
Toddy1, I didn't check your comments on "Kanpur - Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay (CNB-DDU) section" above. Perhaps we need to have another RM since that's the official name, after some time maybe? -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
09:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply