This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
volcanoes,
volcanology,
igneous petrology, and
related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present
information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see
Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the
project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
The article states: "Undetected events are not recorded or surveyed in British Columbia immediately". Maybe I'm missing something, but this seems pretty obvious: if an event is not detected, it's not going to be recorded, at least not until it's discovered/figured out, etc. Is there a more precise way to put this?
True. I thought about this when I created the article but I added it because the reference states it. It's probably better if it were deleted.
Black Tusk (
talk)
15:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)reply
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on
Mount Edziza volcanic complex. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Hi
Pfly, this will probably be my next article to work on. Like
Level Mountain, there are several creeks draining the Mount Edziza volcanic complex. I'm not sure if you are up for the task after creating articles for the Level Mountain creeks/rivers but the following appear to drain this complex:
I know there's not a lot of information for these small creeks but they're still notable enough to have their own articles. They all appear to be part of the Stikine River drainage basin so they should fit nicely into what we have been doing lately. But it will probably take me months to completely rewrite and expand this article from scratch (much longer than for Hoodoo Mountain) so there should be lots of time for you to continue work on the Iskut and Level Mountain streams. This article should be just as large as the one for Level Mountain if not larger given how much information is available for this volcanic complex. It may even turn into one of the largest articles I have ever wrote lol. Volcanoguy00:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Heh yep those all fit into the region regional streams I've been looking at anyway. The smaller streams tend to be pretty easy and quick when there's not a ton to say, like with Twin River near Hoodoo. I started to work on improving Iskut River, which is taking more time since there's more to say. Some of these you've listed are Iskut tributaries or flow from the same area as some Iskut tributaries, so they are somewhat familiar. In any case, I do want to keep working on BC stream pages in general, so this is all just fine. My free time has dwindled a little recently, but it's not like Wikipedia needs to be finished next week or anything. I've been enjoying learning more about the geography of this rather remote part of BC.
Pfly (
talk)
04:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
That's good! I may be able to add some information regarding volcanic hazards for the Iskut River article if you haven't already. Apparently the Little Iskut River was blocked in the past by lava flows from the Edziza complex which resulted in the formation of a large lake upstream. Volcanoguy06:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Pfly: Hi, I'm just wondering if you would be interested in creating articles for the listed creeks. Although it's not a requirement, it would be great to have articles for them in a potential FA article. Volcanoguy15:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Sorry, my Wikipedia-ing has been patchy and unpredictable for a while, for various reasons. I will try to do these sooner or later, but hesitate to promise anything since life is chaos and all, heh. Still, I do want to, and will try to get to it. Sorry for being flakey lately! Where "lately" means at least two years, according to the dates on these comments here. Wow time flies. Damn.
Pfly (
talk)
03:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Would it be worthwhile to have all these creeks get a single unified article rather than one-article-per-creek? I think maintaining such unified articles can sometimes be easier than many smaller ones.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk)
06:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure what that unified article would be. All of the streams I listed above are in the
Stikine River drainage basin but the Stikine River article is already quite lengthy. An article about the drainage basin would also become large since the Stikine is a major river containing hundreds of tributaries. There's also not a whole lot of information about hydrology at the Mount Edziza complex to really warrant a separate article. Volcanoguy22:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Would a list article still be worthwhile if most or all of the listed creeks have enough information to write articles that are larger than stubs? It should be possible to write articles about them that are at least start class. Volcanoguy01:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
It would be an easier decision to make if I knew of a single unified article about streams flowing from a specific mountain or mountain range to get an idea of how to put one together. Obviously such an article would be different from one about seamounts. There's a
List of rivers of the Rocky Mountains but all the listed rivers have their own articles. Volcanoguy08:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Oh hang on, Flyin Creek? Sorcery? Stewbomb? Heh, with names like those I'll try to do at least those soon! I'll try to do more, but how can me, Pfly, not do Flyin Creek? heh.
Pfly (
talk)
23:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)reply