How has nobody noticed that the plot outline sucks? its written as an exact account of what each character does (liu kang kicks this guy, who falls over, but its ok because he then gets up and throws a punch etc) its unreadable. Oh and referring to the director christopher morrison guy as mink liek this is common knowledge. I've never heard of the guy before, let alone knowing him as personally as saying "mink said this, mink said that" clean it up guys, pretty much this whole article sucks. Dark_Wounds 15:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I reverted a recent edit by 86.144.60.11. In it, he stated that the film's canon is different from the game's, which is true. However, he mentions the X-Men flicks as a comparison. With that in mind, I'm restoring the section (although I am trimming it some); X3 has a similar section at Comparison with the comics. With that in mind, I've renamed the section Deviations from game canon and trimmed the items that didn't really fit. EVula 15:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Good gravy? Somebody totally peed on the Critical reaction section. There wasn't anything wrong with it, so why was it edited. I've changed stuff around and eliminated some redundant info. One reason why I think these changes were needed, as funny as you find the tag-line Destroy all expectations! mentioning it in the article does not enhance the quality of it. I also found things like continuity errors (Johnny's glasses) rather irrelevant and am planning to remove the Inconsitencies to Canon section soon. Any little continuity errors should be left at IMDb.-- HannuMakinen 10:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
What's the deal with a random redirect to this page with the link /info/en/?search=Lynn_%22Red%22_Williams from the /info/en/?search=American_Gladiators American Gladiators page? So random; so weird.
Some people have seemed to take an offence to the way this section was worded so I took the liberty of cutting down on the proverbial weasel-words and hope that this section now appears more wiki-worthy. Just to remind people, no matter how you slice it, the movie was not a big success, it was't very beloved and neither of those facts have changed. This section was originated by me, specifically to answer why all of these things happened, but I'm not trying to defend this film in any way, I merely want it to have an appropriate entry in Wikipedia, just like every other film that has a page here. - TheHande 13:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I just realized today that the film is no longer on IMDb's bottom 100, though I'm sure it was there for a while. I removed the reference from Critical Reactions section. - TheHande 06:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
What the heck. This probably is one of the worst movies ever made. HAHA! I didn't even know it had a cinema release. WTF! It pales in comparison to bad B-movies. 87.168.241.6 ( talk) 13:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I heard rumors of a cut of this film available in asia. It supposedly adds tons of unused footage. Someone should write this up if they have the info. I seen a pic of the alternate ending where Quan Chi and Shinnok are talking online somewhere. If someone has that pic it could supplement the addition. -- Iamstillhiro1112 21:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Mileena movie2 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Where were the shooting locations for the movie? Angie Y. ( talk) 22:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Is imdb messing with everyone?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293429/
It says in the cast section, Micheal August as Reiko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.222.214.72 ( talk) 03:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Who is Oren Uziel?
I looked up google, nothing.
On the page, the release date says 2013. Is this true?
Please leave on the section about Gametrailers I added. They're an authoritative source of information regarding anything relating to video games. Leave on the quote too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjnboy ( talk • contribs) 14:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
The GameTrailers quote has once again been removed. There is plenty of criticism from established sources therein and to throw in silly fanboyish comments about the movie from a gaming website makes no sense. Remarks like "Cage's agent told him to kill him off" and the like are nonsensical and add nothing to the section. sixtynine • spill it • 03:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
I think the part about Rebirth should be removed from the sequel section, as the short film is neither a sequel, nor even a prequel related to this or even the first film. They are all completely unrelated. U2hmtmkmkm ( talk) 15:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140816231530/http://www.yiyimovie.com/wiki/47/3647-Mortal-Kombat-Annihilation.asp
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Mortal_Kombat:_Annihilation
http://www.medbib.com/Mortal_Kombat:_Annihilation. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕ Contribs 10:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Raiden and Shao Kahn aren't brothers in the primary storyline that is MK1-7+9-11 just for example. This is a retelling where the director has taken some liberties which is commonplace in licensed movies. If possible, we could mention the word "non-canon" to in the article description to clear any confusion on this. ToniTurunen ( talk) 10:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)