This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Suggest renaming it monocarpy. Richard001 ( talk) 07:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

If that's the correct noun, I'd support that - the current title is an adjective, a noun would be preferable. PaleCloudedWhite ( talk) 19:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Is monocarpism the correct term? PaleCloudedWhite ( talk) 19:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC) reply

No, monocarpy is the normal usage. Guettarda ( talk) 22:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC) reply

It's not normal usage, in the sense that the noun "monocarpy" is very rarely used, whereas "monocarpic" is an extremely common adjective. KarlM ( talk) 05:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Umm...a. we're talking about noun usage here, and b. I'm responding to PaleCloudedWhite's question. And, c. article titles are supposed to be nouns. Guettarda ( talk) 11:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC) reply