![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This WP:BLP requires more and better reliable sources to support even non-contentious content. Recent edit history of reversions, escalation to WP:BLPN, and protection with zero talk page input all signify there are probably more productive ways to set about a correction. I support User:ToBeFree's edits as removal of cruft verbatim. And think this is the best place to explain views to the contrary. WP:BLPN is for when having done so doesn't result in a WP:CONSENSUS. Proponents of content inclusion, please discuss the reasons here. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)