Talk:moga Punjab

India: Cities / Punjab Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Requested move 25 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus that the Punjab city is the primary topic. Jenks24 ( talk) 01:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Moga, Punjab → Moga – As per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. – Filpro ( talk) 17:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 23:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Filpro: Or should the plain name continue to be the disambig? Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 23:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply

The other contested major use of Moga seems to be Moga, Iran, but it is only a village and with 52 residents. Moga, Punjab with 150,432 residents seems to be primary topic. Filpro ( talk) 00:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Procedural revert move the disambiguation page back to the base name, since this is an improperly formatted multimove. -- 70.51.44.60 ( talk) 07:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment the existence of Moga district also in Punjab would suggest that the article's current name is bad, and instead should be Moga (city), Punjab -- 70.51.44.60 ( talk) 07:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply
You clearly don't understand the naming standards for sub-state entities. Filpro ( talk) 23:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Oppose per WP:Precision. Also, the article has maintenance issues. I don't know why Moga, Iran is considered notable. Moga district is in poor state also. They fail to be primary topics, even when no criteria have been defined. George Ho ( talk) 05:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply
According to WP:Precision, this article is too precise. And unnecessarily so. There is a clear primary topic for Moga. Filpro ( talk) 23:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Oppose no primary exists. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Please elaborate. Filpro ( talk) 23:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 12 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mehakdeepkaur001 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by SANDHU20 ( talk) 20:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply