This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
A fact from Misfits and Magic appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 August 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the creators of Misfits and Magic said that they sympathize with those who choose not to watch it?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Reviewing... new, long enough, QPQ provided, hook in article and followed by citation to a reference containing hook fact. Will complete soon.
Whispyhistory (
talk)
06:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't know the proper way to make such a request and format it, etc. However, this article does not seem to me to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. It's not balanced. It seems more like advertising. It also seems to contain BLP-violating allegations about JK Rowling.
I don't really think you should be commenting on this, given that the article is obviously your baby and you are thus very biased. mrouttalk09:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
There is a rather famous quote that goes "Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add but when there is nothing left to take away." There is value in removing material that is unnecessary or poorly written, or which covers non-notable material. That you think something is interesting does not justify its inclusion on this website. There is no requirement that someone contribute to Wikipedia by adding more words than he removes.
You also do not own your article just because you wrote it. It is not your baby, which you can or should act protectively towards. I'm not "undoing other people's work", I am suggesting the removal of information from a website. Everything written on this website was written by someone. Are you proposing nothing should ever be removed?
Also it's super cringe, as the kids would say, to creepily follow me around and comment on things I've posted because of a disagreement about another, completely unrelated article. mrouttalk10:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)reply