![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minneapolis City Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/79868182.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://mn.gov/oah/multimedia/pdf/032520970.finrt.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The items mentioned in the controversies section occurred from 16 to 9 years ago. Pretty much ancient history in city politics. Are they still worth mentioning in this article? Or could we at least change the title to something like Historical Controversies? T bonham ( talk) 06:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I think that this reason seems particularly politically motivated. I don't think that these historical controversies should definately be removed from the article, but should probably just be worked into the body of the history section. Aurora (User:Horkak) (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
The Democratic Socialists of America often endorse candidates, and members run as part of the Democratic Party. The source provided is not sufficient to convince me that Robin Wonsley Worlobah should be listed as a DSA member on the article. If there were a source where she specifically stated that she was running on the DSA party line, I think that would be sufficient. Aurora (User:Horkak) (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Setting aside right here any possible discussion on if Robin Wonsley Worlobah is a Democratic Socialist candidate, are there any grounds for listing her as the opposition leader? Does any source consider her this, or is there precedent for calling individual third party candidates as an opposition leader for this council, for example, with Cameron A. Gordon from the Green Party? Akalendos ( talk) 21:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)