This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship, or
sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our
to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Is there any other "Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship" in the world? It's clearly not a generic name, and there would be no need to fix something that isn't broken
MBelgrano (
talk)
01:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Given the periodic changes of actual Argentine ministries and of its official names, maybe we should standarize article names along with international costumes regarding its main functions. Or maybe not. I wouldn't mind of a solution in either way. --
IANVS (
talk)
01:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)reply
That's right, I haven't thought on that, ministers usually change their names and scopes every few years. I support using then a generic name and "(Argentina)" at the end. But for the future, articles on ministers should note such changes across history (but it would be hard to trace, history books rarely concern themselves with such details)
MBelgrano (
talk)
02:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Chancellor
"chancellor" - Canciller in Spanish and Chanceler in Portuguese - are commonly used to refer to a foreign minister. It is often used as a synonym to the full titles of the ministers of foreign affairs in latin america. In this case should be writen in some part of the article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
181.91.107.231 (
talk)
13:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)reply