![]() | Michel Vaillant was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All I would suggest needs doing to get this article to GA status is to expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. [?] Good work, Hiding T 12:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
There are many problems here. The article needs a thorough copy-edit for grammar. Some examples of types of problems are below.
Recurring problems
Other comments
OK here.
OK here.
Here's an example of an image with a good Fair Use Rationale: File:ND1tsotoc.JPG
I'm putting the article on hold for a week. Ricardiana ( talk) 19:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I did some some grammar fixing on the first three sections - there was a bit of repetition that I removed and some data that I placed elsewhere. I also broke the text into smaller paragraphs. I could run through the whole article maybe by next weekend.
-- Scott Free ( talk) 03:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I am failing the article for now, for reasons detailed below. Feel free to request a GAR or re-nominate the article later.
I realize that people are working and plan to work on the article. However, the on hold process is only supposed to last a week, and a fail now does not prevent either re-assessment or re-nomination. In addition, the article has not been worked on by either the nominating editor, Boz, or Fram, the editor who asked Boz to nominate. Next time, issues can be resolved more quickly by having a nominating editor who is involved in the project and watches the page.
Reasons for fail:
Ricardiana ( talk) 20:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
We just finished doing a pitstop and giving a wicked tune-up on MV - so the article is all revved up and raring to ride on the next leg of the GA Grand Prix...
-- Scott Free ( talk) 15:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Michel Vaillant/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
The article
Michel Vaillant deserves the B-class status for various reasons:
That a fan site probably contains correct information is not enough, nor that it is accepted by the author or publisher (where do you get that idea, by the way? Who says that Graton in any way is endorsing Jimontheweb or Cartype?). You have sourced from blogs [1] =5276 [2] (see WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided point 11), linked to huge images from MV comics [3], which is linking to copyright violations( WP:C#Linking to copyrighted works. Other sources include a fan site. In general, you have very few reliable independent sources. Fram ( talk) 07:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC) (copied from User talk:Fram) The concern is that sometimes, reliable sources are very difficult to find, and this is the case for Michel Vaillant. In such cases, there are three arguments to support the presence of non-reliable sources in an article: 1) all fan sites have to ask for the authorization to display copyrighted images in their site: this is a manner for publishers and authors to control the creation of such websites. 2) if one deletes all the non-reliable sources, the article is likely to remain C-class for lack of references. 3) citing non-reliable sources is better than citing no sources at all. -- Pah777 ( talk) 17:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC) (copied from User talk:Fram)
|
Last edited at 07:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 23:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michel Vaillant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Michel Vaillant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://automobile.nouvelobs.com/dossiers/2531/marque/modele/article.html?xtmc=michelvaillant&xtcr=7When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)