This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
I will probably accept this draft, and the removal of the
WP:FANCRUFT can take place in article space. There already is an article for one of the characters. The AFD had to do with a list, and the comments in the AFD seem consistent with adequately developed character articles.
@
Robert McClenon: I apologise if it's out of place to comment on a draft review, but I would strongly argue against accepting this draft. The
notability here seems to be entirely
inherited, both from Grand Theft Auto V and
Trevor Philips. The "Character design" section (almost entirely copied from
the Development article) consists of seven sources: four about the game, and three about Trevor with peripheral mentions of Michael. The "Reception" section has one useful quote from a game review, but the two others are simply about his relationship (or comparison to) Trevor (one of which literally comes from a review of Trevor). All other sources are
primary. The character is not independently notable and I would suggest declining the draft outright. I should also add that the AfD only had one (weak) mention of separate character articles. –
Rhain☔23:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)reply