The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Melville Fuller's mustache (pictured) was denounced as "deplorable" by the New York Sun, which claimed that it distracted lawyers and debased the court's dignity?
Current status: Featured article
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States federal courts,
courthouses, and
United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Chief Justice Fuller's famous immigration case, Gonzalez vs. Williams, was not mentioned in the article so I added details pertaining to the case, including the mention of Isabel Gonzalez (appellant), and how she paved the way for US citizenship rights for Puerto Rico.
Belinda Torres-Mary (
talk)
18:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Term of service as Chief Justice
Hi. Mr. Fuller started as
Chief Justice of the United States on October 8, 1888, not July 20, 1888. He was confirmed by the Senate on July 20, but he chose not to take the oath, which is what counts as the start for our purposes (and nearly everyone else's). The oath is mentioned here: <
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members_text.aspx>
Quoting from that page:
The date a Member of the Court took his/her Judicial oath (the Judiciary Act provided “That the Justices of the Supreme Court, and the district judges, before they proceed to execute the duties of their respective offices, shall take the following oath . . . ”) is here used as the date of the beginning of his/her service, for until that oath is taken he/she is not vested with the prerogatives of the office.
MZMcBride, I would suggest that you might want to format the references like I did in
Morrison Waite.
Oyez.org also has all the relevant dates of confirmation receipt of commission, and oath of office. That would be closer to standard. 7&6=thirteen (
☎)08:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)reply
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Melville Fuller. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
I have substantially expanded this article, so I'd appreciate it if any talk-page watchers would like to read it through to find any embarrassing mistakes. Cheers,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Not a mistake, but I would suggest noting that Fuller's death during the Republican administration of William Howard Taft gave the president the ability to shift the composition of the court. Taft could have appointed a Republican to succeed Fuller as Chief Justice, but instead opted to elevate Associate Justice Edward Douglass White. However, Taft did nominate Republican Willis Van Devanter to fill the vacancy on the court caused by White's elevation.
BD2412T18:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Very interesting! From what I gather, Taft and White had very similar judicial philosophies notwithstanding their different political parties. As such, elevating White was hardly the act of altruism that the modern eye might perceive it to be. (Some even think Taft deliberately chose the older White so that he could succeed him when the time came. If that was his plan, it worked!) I'm not sure how helpful this fascinating information would be here, though: it would probably make more sense to discuss it in White's article. If I ever finish Fuller, perhaps I'll work on White. He seems to have been a very interesting character also. (Wouldn't it be great if "Chief Justices of the United States" became a good/featured topic? That would be such a wonderful thing, although it would take eons to complete.) Anyway, thanks so much for sharing this. May I ask your thoughts on this article's readiness for GAN? I'm proud of my work here, but I'd appreciate another perspective from someone who understands both the Good Article process and the law – e.g. you. Cheers!
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Well, I will say that I have only brought a handful of articles to GA status, and never guided the process, but I don't see anything here that falls afoul of GA standards. I have started a stub for the redlinked case, McCray v. United States.
BD2412T05:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for starting McCray - I was going to do that eventually but I'm glad you've taken care of it. I've now nominated Fuller for GA status, so we'll see what becomes of that. Again, thanks!
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)reply