![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melanie Phillips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Melanie Phillips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35689{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.spectator.co.uk/politics/all/735456/uk-drugs-policy-commission-responds-to-melanie-phillips.thtmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Melanie Phillips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Melanie Phillips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
There is no reason why the article should not cover Phillips' views on global warming. Accordingly, a section on it will be inserted. — Calisthenis (Talk) 20:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
From a policy standpoint, the notion that the BBC piece is not a RS is nonsense. I don't see any BLP issue here, either. Newimpartial ( talk) 03:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Now Gerrymorgan has re-inserted the BBC-sourced material that has been disputed in this thread, and re-inserted some more material which I regard as misquoting. E.g. Phillips wrote "According to a new study, scientists’ claims that coral reefs are doomed by ocean acidification are overplayed." and Gerrymorgan insists that the article say she has written that "claims that coral reefs are doomed by ocean acidification are overplayed". I have not reverted again since I guess it would just be re-inserted again. Peter Gulutzan ( talk) 15:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
The profile photo seems to be intended to be as unflattering as possible, is there not a more standard one that can be used. Jprw ( talk) 11:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The article, which she says was about the term Islamophobia and its use and not Muslims, was indeed criticised and not just by the Guardian. According to the JC " A number of people within the Jewish community, and friends of the community, have expressed their dismay – and anger – at its content." Two more articles are [1] The editor also said "Given our commitment to covering a range of legitimate views, we have also published a piece on the same subject by David Toube of the Quilliam Foundation. One by Shiraz Maher of King’s College, London will follow shortly. Both disagree with Melanie Phillips." So the JC didn't treat this as minor and there are other sources, eg this one which starts "Ex-Conservative chair Sayeeda Warsi has condemned an article by Times columnist Melanie Phillips." [2] My revert was of course an accident and I didn't even look at the edit carefully, but when I was alerted I took a look and disagree with the suggestion it doesn't belong in the article. Doug Weller talk 19:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)