This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics: Relativity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the relativity task force.

The contents of the Mathisson–Papapetrou equations page were merged into Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations on October 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Text and/or other creative content from Mathisson–Papapetrou equations was copied or moved into Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

The contents of the Papapetrou–Dixon equations page were merged into Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations on October 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Text and/or other creative content from Papapetrou–Dixon equations was copied or moved into Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Should we merge

• Papapetrou–Dixon equations
• Mathisson–Papapetrou equations
• Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations

into one big article? They seem so similar. It seems the more common names are "Mathisson–Papapetrou" and "Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon", much more than "Papapetrou–Dixon". M∧Ŝ c²ħε И_τlk 14:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Done. M∧Ŝ c²ħε И_τlk 17:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

I think the current version of this article is rather confusing.I plan to tidy it up with a consistent notion of the MPD equations as they are now commonly used. I made a start by adding text to the last section. Does anyone have any objections to this? Mike Stone ( talk) 18:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply