This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 7 July 2023 by Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d.
|
What is the connection between Garbus, who is an attorney, and the list of Films? Sbowers3 ( talk) 22:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
One of Wikipedia's most important policies is verifiability: "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."
The standard for sources is secondary sources. The sources to this article are primary sources and tertiary sources, which are considered less reliable. This article would be improved by providing references to reliable secondary sources, e.g. newspapers or magazines.
Verifiability would also be improved if each section had footnotes to the source of information, rather than just having a list of references. Sbowers3 ( talk) 22:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Each of the films deal with first amendment and other legal issues in which martin garbus is interviewed at length
The first film has interviews with martin garbus that deal with free speech in america
The second deals with attacks on the Motion Picture Associations rating system for movies.Martin Garbus disscusses censorship a lawsuit he filed challenging the constitionality of the Ratings Code.
The third film deals with the life and legal problems of Lenny Bruce.Martin Garbus who was his la~wyyer is interviewed at length —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Deborah vogel (
talk •
contribs)
00:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I checked with another experienced editor. We both agree that the client list is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Please do not re-include it. Sbowers3 ( talk) 22:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
The client list has been taken off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenmcohen ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
In an effort to address and have removed the language about the article having multiple issues: If you are a frequent contributor to the page and have a relationship to the subject, please declare a "Conflict of Interest" before making additional edits. Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI - Wikipedia Kim Connolly ( talk) 13:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Since 2020, Mr. Garbus is a member of the Advisory Board of the Harvard Medical School Teaching Hospital. https://clbb.mgh.harvard.edu/advisory-board-3/martin-garbus-2/
Kim Connolly ( talk) 18:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
References