This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Historiography C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military historiography task force

Is the Singaporean Red Beret distinct from the British Maroon? If you are knowledgable, please consider adding to the maroon beret article. Ng.j 15:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC) reply

They wear the tan beret, not the maroon.
-- Ng.j 06:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 11:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC) reply

The section needs clarification. It does not state anywhere whether the entire VNG or only a particular unit within the VNG wears the maroon beret. Roger ( talk) 18:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

..lol.. is not referred to as "cornflower blue". It is referred to as "Ultra-marine" at least in Airborn" recruitment ads. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.247.42.20 ( talk) 20:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Most of the material in this section should be deleted, not only because it is unreferenced, but because it is irrelevant to the article. 64.26.155.230 ( talk) 17:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) reply

An image used in this article, File:USAF Pararescue Beret.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:USAF Pararescue Beret.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 05:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC) reply

What is with the picture of two guys boxig in the Ukraine section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.24.134 ( talk) 15:57, 26 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Maroon beret. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141001071949/http://www.army.mil/features/beret/beret.htm to http://www.army.mil/features/beret/beret.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141001071949/http://www.army.mil/features/beret/beret.htm to http://www.army.mil/features/beret/beret.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141001071949/http://www.army.mil/features/beret/beret.htm to http://www.army.mil/features/beret/beret.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

If we can discuss about the colour of the British beret, regarding the others... either I have eyes problems or they're all reds! and a lot of them are in both articles, this one and the Red beret, linked at the bottom. I think it would be relevant to merge both and precise that the British one is maroon and not exactly red. Any advice? -- Davric ( talk) 14:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• 3RAR beret.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC) reply