This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Mark Bailey (rugby union). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Mark Bailey (rugby union) → Mark Bailey (historian) – As the page clearly attests, this person played rugby, yes, at a highly competitive level, whilst a student at Cambridge University, between 1983 and 1990. This was an extracurricular activity not a main profession. Bailey was trained as a medieval historian, obtaining his PhD at Cambridge in 1987, at the same time as his competitive playing. Since then he has worked as a historian, first at Cambridge, now at the University of East Anglia. Ie he played rugby (yes, at a notable level!) competitively for 7 years and has worked as an academic for 40 years, including serving as master of a top rated school in London, Saint Paul’s. The page already includes the relevant links for his current and older affiliations. You can confirm the dates of his competitive rugby playing here
http://en.espn.co.uk/england/rugby/player/9657.html. The introduction gives links to his current academic endeavors, including being invited to lecture in probably the most famous and respected history lecture series at Oxford University, the Ford Lectures! His current book is coming out as part of that series, which has produced some of the most influential books in English history. He is competing at the top of academia and Wikipedia identifies him by his athletic endeavors of a few years 30 years ago? This is actually damaging to his current professional reputation (this is not him writing, otherwise the discussion of rugby would be more knowledgeable.
Kiwisleep (
talk)
19:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per nomination. The only other circumstance of a similar nature that comes to mind is
Michael Burns (actor and historian), who is currently at the streamlined main title header
Michael Burns (actor), since the key aspect of his renown continues to be based upon his career as an adolescent actor rather than upon his later career as a middle-aged (and now senior citizen) academic. In the case at hand, however, Mark Bailey does appear to be at least as well if not better known as a historian than as a young rugby player, although I would also support, if approved by consensus, making an exception in Bailey's case and highlighting both of his claims to notability —
Mark Bailey (rugby union player and historian) or the shorter
Mark Bailey (rugby union and historian). —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)20:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose A renowned historian yes, but he played in a Rugby World Cup for England in 1987 and in the English top division of the time, not just at university. It's difficult to know what a reader would be looking for, as many could be looking for his rugby history, and others more interested in his historical writing and academic speeches. I'm not opposed to moving to
Mark Bailey (rugby union and historian, although I don't really like the longer multiple titles, and perhaps
Mark Bailey (historian) could be turned into a redirect. I'm happy to reconsider this following more discussion though.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk)
09:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose he was an international rugby player, and to me that gets at least as much coverage as being an academic- most of the sources for his academic career are primary sources from places he worked. I would be fine with some compromise disambiguation however.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
08:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. Someone's profile is not determined by which of his activities get more coverage or by what activity a particular reader prefers but which of his activities has been more important over time or define the person right now. He is a professor and historian who has received an honor from the top of his profession and has served as such for three decades. He has also served as Master of St Paul's, a top school in London. But he is also famous as a rugby player, where he competed internationally and has been highly acclaimed. His identifier should note that. But historian or professor should definitely be first, as it is the longest standing affiliation. As Necrothesp says, "His main career is as an historian and he would merit an article as an historian even if he had not played rugby." Michael Burns, noted by Roman Spinner, would likely not have received a wikipedia page for just publishing one book--that is rarely enough. Fact is, he is mainly a historian and has been a distinguished rugby player, so the title should not redirect but simply reflect that, that he is an all-round person. A good compromise is (historian and sportsman) or (historian and former rugby player). Or instead of historian, professor. But the change should happen. See how he is described here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Jeklu0oBDA. It is simply odd for someone giving the Ford Lectures at Oxford (that's like competing internationally!) to not have that reflected in the description of his profession. The sources for his academic career are from the most distinguished places in the UK!
Peter9753 (
talk)
12:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I sympathise, but also disagree with the fact that all mentions of playing international rugby had been removed from the lead, and just shoved in a general section with early life. The fact is, he's a notable former rugby player as well as a current historian, and the article, both in name and content layout, should reflect both, rather than biasing towards his current career.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
12:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Can someone kindly move this forward so that we can close this? It's hard to believe that there is debate on this given the man's bio. He is delivering the most prestigious lecture series on history at Oxford, is currently a professor of history, and wikipedia editors are debating whether he should have the word "historian" added as a descriptor? At the very least the suggestion by Peter9753 makes sense, to list both, with the current and most long-standing one, namely historian, first. Thanks!
Kiwisleep (
talk)
04:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Rugby player too
The version at
Special:Diff/1033757519 shows a clear attempt to whitewash his rugby career. He is a former international player, which is worthy of content in the lead, and also in a separate "Sports career" section. It isn't just something to throw away in an early life section for his personal life. Yes he's a hostorian now, but he's also an international rugby player, so editors should stop belittling that contribution.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
22:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Schoolmaster
I agree that 'rugby player' is probably not the best description for Mark Bailey. A comparison might be someone like Owen Chadwick who was Master of Selwyn College, Cambridge, and who played Rugby for Cambridge University and the British Lions: he is primarily described as a theologian and historian rather than as a Rugby player.
But surely Bailey's main profession has been as a schoolmaster. Yes he's an historian but he's hardly
Thucydides. His Ph.D. was about commercial rabbiting in Medieval East Anglia. I would think that the profile and prestige attached to being a former Headmaster of Leeds Grammar School and St Paul's School probably opens the door to a range of opportunities in terms of Lectureships and Professorships that might be otherwise be more difficult to attain.
Would the word 'academic' cover his scholastic profession and his work as a historian? Then his article could lead with the Statement that 'Mark Bailey is an educator, historian and a former England Rugby Union international'. Just a suggestion.
Incidentally I remember watching Bailey play for Bedford a few times in the early 1980s and it's suddenly occurred to me that that was 40 years ago. It makes me feel very old.