![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
"Hedgehog Engine 2" was added in revision 896636428 by an anonymous user. Sonic fans seem to have a strange obsession with "ENGINES!!", e.g. slamming games that "don't have an engine" while praising games that "do" have an "engine" regardless of the actual gameplay.
Never mind the fact that "Hedgehog Engine 2" is not a game engine; it's a lighting engine.
Is there any confirmed source indicating that M&S 2020 does in fact use HE2? --- GerbilSoft ( talk) 03:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
I removed part of the text that suggested this was the game's final entrance to the series. There's nothing, to my knowledge, supporting this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.55.193 ( talk) 19:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Who in the world quoted the Onion about this!? 2600:1700:CC40:E890:1D09:67EE:4E5A:8FE ( talk) 23:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Opening up a discussion, as there seems to be some back and forth and misconceptions.
I know this might seem like I'm splitting hairs over something that could, theoretically, be left in, but I just feel like this addition adds nothing to the article. Like I've said before, using an unrelated source about a general fact to do with Tokyo 2020, that doesn't have anything to do with the game itself, to point out that something ISN'T happening, with no other context, doesn't make sense. If that is considered "notable", than you could come up with absolutely anything that also is NOT happening to this game, then find a general source that is able to proof it. Just because it's something you can prove with a source that doesn't make it worthwhile as an addition, and just because it is a notable fact in general, that doesn't make it notable within the context of this specific article. Putting a footnote on all Tokyo 2020 stuff that the name isn't changing is utterly pointless. The only argument I can see, as to why this needs to be included is because there are, for whatever reason, a bunch of people who don't seem to understand that SEGA aren't gonna be changing the name of the game to "Tokyo 2021" and have tried to edit the article in the past to change the name to this. However this is an individual's problem, and not something that matters when talking about what does and doesn't belong on an article. People should be able to take it upon themselves to look into a matter like this one themselves, if it bothers/interests them enough. An article shouldn't assume that people don't have the capacity to do further research beyond what's on the article and feel the need to shove absolutely all frivolous information onto that article, regardless of whether it's a needed addition or not. -- 94.10.99.121 ( talk) 19:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)