This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Women in Red: 2022 This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Engineering This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

If she was born in 1838, how could she have taken a patent in 1980?-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 00:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC) reply

That's my mistake, it should have been 1890. I just corrected it. DaffodilOcean ( talk) 00:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I have just edited the page to remove the WP:PUFFERY from the page. The examples include these phrases: 'innovator skillset','deep knowledge','critical inventions','great potential',brilliant female engineer',and 'innovative thinker'. The article also had new additions of sentences citing blogs, which are not considered reliable sources, see WP:USERGENERATED. Hopefully future versions of the page can retain an encyclopedic tone, and stick to the known facts. DaffodilOcean ( talk) 21:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Also added some sources after reading about it at the Teahouse. Interesting subject. Regards, Darwin Naz ( talk) 02:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I came across a draft article on Wilcox that might have some usable information that could be incorporated in this article. You can find it at User:Nico C35/sandbox. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC) reply