This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a
WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to
writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
I really can't see the point of this article. All it is a phonemic inventory of Mapudungun. The main article on the language has exactly the same info. Delete?
67.170.176.20306:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)reply
I'm the author of this article. It's not just about phonology, it's about the various attempts at orthography; because Mapudungun doesn't have a native orthography, many people have created their own means to record the language. I'll leave the final decision to someone with more experience in information organization and an user account.
LGMᚂ20:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)reply
I quite agree with LGM, in that the by now old efforts to find a consensual writing system for mapudungun do merit an article of their own. Since most of these systems are beind used simultaneously, such a page should certainly be helpful to users dealing with the language. --
Heinrich Puschmann15:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)reply