This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Occult Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I Believe this is highly Blasphemous to Malphas, and i would like this description to be changed.

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas ( talk) 02:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC) reply

I did what was asked i brought the topic here, yet there is no reply, and i already know the outcome, just because i want to rectify this blasphemous information about Malphas, you will find any excuse to ban me and keep the old information.

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas ( talk) 02:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC) reply

It's only been a few minutes. Please have a little patience. I'm hoping to get more input from the noticeboard. Basically, they might be used as a reference for what they believe, but very unlikely for what is. -- Onorem ♠ Dil 02:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC) reply

This is so typical i have faced this situation many times, just because i am a Spiritual Satanist you all either ignore, Silence, suspend, or ban my account. This is a good view of the biased opinion you take towards the Gods, www.JoyofSatan.org, and Spiritual Satanists. I will correctly change Malphas's Description! no matter How Many time you ban me. I have the constitutional right to freedom of speech, and the right to post the truth on a public forum\media.

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas ( talk) 02:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC) reply

you seem to be the only person with an un-biased opinion, i am sorry for my impatience but this has happend to me many times and i am starting to get sick of it. thank you for bieng the sensible enough to talk to, even with my last attempts in the now banned account S.O Malphas.

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas ( talk) 02:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. I was just wondering, Samurai of Malphas...

I've always been interested in Satanism/Demonology. However getting too involved in it does frighten me a bit, but that won't stop me from studying it. What would your description of the demon Malphas be, just out of interest?

Thanks. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.128.98 ( talk) 13:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

That user has not been active since January last year. I seriously doubt you're going to get a response, but considering he calls himself a "Samurai of Malphas" and thinks the traditional description is "blasphemous," he's probably going to fanboy and go with something comic-book-ish and "cool." Looking through his edits, he tried to make the article say:

"Malphas has tan skin and a muscular build. He has dark brown hair and wears a goatee. His face is square shaped and he has high cheek-bones and blue eyes. He can appear very dark, showing only his blue eyes. He has large grey wings. He has a blue aura which he projects."

This is just some 20th century fantasy from a group called a group called The Joy of Satan (a neo-nazi Satanist website that thinks aliens programmed us to believe in God), as opposed to a medieval fantasy with a degree of consensus with Johann Weyer and other medieval demonologists. By the way, Satanism and demonology are not the same: before the 20th century, most demonologists would have said they were Christian, Jewish, or Muslim, and wrote grimoires under the assumption that their religion was unversal fact. Ian.thomson ( talk) 13:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I noticed that Malphas' appearance in Faith was removed in particular while every other item on the list stays, the reasoning being that it had no reliable source. I found this to be a bit of a loaded removal considering everything else on the list and that it was the only one with any source at all. Of course, I noticed after making my edit that Faith was still on the list, but the much more detailed one had been removed. That makes less sense to me, but I would be interested in the reasoning for this.

Anyhow, I figured I'd start the discussion here. What items should be removed from it, and which should stay? What items could be considered trivial? I think off the bat, Devil May Cry, Bayonetta, and Castlevania are notable enough to keep. Delukiel ( talk) 22:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC) reply