This article was nominated for
deletion on 4 February 2010 (UTC). The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in
business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
I've started cleaning up this article, I've added a couple of references already - but still does not assert notability. I will fix it up within the next week. Any help is welcome! -
Ozzykhan20:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Found some good third party verifiable sources that should be included in article:
Well you just have to add the Frobes reference into the article. I had the Kellogg one in there until someone changed it up and removed it in the process. -
Ozzykhan15:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Reads as standard marketing put out by I guess her blog. It is her father that is notable Deepak the kids try to gain notability by association. While people have not decided she is notable will take away the stuff which is not established.
Smalltinsquirrel (
talk)
09:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)reply
The way it looks, the person cannot be notable. I suggest to write what you wrote above (the links) into the article. Her father should come later in the article once she is proved to be notable. Did you see the dead link in the article?? Update or remove it. There are hundreds of thousands who are superior to her in the field and they are not on Wikipedia!!! --
Athos, Porthos, and Aramis (
talk)
23:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)reply
--As for Articles for Deletion status, whoever placed that notice failed to create an entry for this article on the Articles for Deletion section, as should have been done, so there's no space there for users to comment on the merits of deletion. As for whether or not the subject is worthy of an entry, if the criterion is that the article be useful to users, then the article should be kept. I looked up the article for more information on the subject after seeing her discussed (on her own merits, with no mention of her father) in the New York Times. As Google comes up with half a million results for "Mallika Chopra," it seems she's got enough of a presence in the world that a lot of people may want more information about her--the article is useful. Even the basic information now given, that she's a writer about family, etc., gave me more information than I had before and was useful to me, though of course a bit more would be helpful. The offense the previous poster apparently takes at the presence of this article (the authoritative "cannot," hyperbole and triple exclamation points) is so out of proportion that it suggests the writer is upset about something that's got nothing to do with the article. I've got no ax to grind here: I came to this article because I'd never heard of the subject until I saw her quoted in the Times and wanted to know who she was.
118.243.151.151 (
talk)
06:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Whatever the status of deletion, while here we should try to polish this page up. The last sentence in the main paragraph has an insane burst of citations. This should be cleaned up and the sources either pared down or distributed to their correct places, but I wanted to first check if someone had a reason for 16 citations to be listed after one sentence?
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mallika Chopra. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.