This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Décrit en détail dans l'article francophone, résultat d'études des spécialistes français Jean-Marc Garot (membre de l' académie de l'air et de l'espace), Michel Delarche avec ingénieurs spécialistes d'Inmarsat:
Par ailleurs, c'est dit dans la version francophone, ils ont eu des interviews dans les medias français dont des émissions de télévision.-- Friendly, Kasos_fr ( talk) 13:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Described in detail in the article francophone, result of studies of French specialists Jean-Marc Garot (member of the academy of air and space), Michel Delarche with engineers specialists of Inmarsat:
Moreover, it is said in the French version, they had interviews in French media including TV shows .-- Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)-- Friendly, Kasos_fr ( talk) 07:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
It's 24 to 48 hours since the announcement that a large piece of apparent Boeing 777 debris washed up in La Reunion is being sent to France for analysis. 24 to 48 hours seems more than enough time for various allegedly RS media sources to report on conclusions being drawn about this on the Internet. I would expect the obvious one is that, per the maps in our Ocean circulation article, Indian Ocean currents tend to flow from around Diego Garcia (with its American base) towards La Reunion, and do not tend to flow from where everybody was told to search (off Australia) towards La Reunion (or at least it takes a lot longer for them to reach La Reunion from off Australia after circling round about half the Indian Ocean), thus presumably fuelling the Diego Garcia and Shootdown theories. I'm not sufficiently interested to want to go looking for the relevant RS sources myself, but other editors might be, and finding such RS sources would quite likely help them to improve this article, so I just thought I'd mention it here in case any editor is interested. Tlhslobus ( talk) 05:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
The flight was quite obviously shot down en route to Diego Garcia and the subsequent coverup and all information has been classified for national security reasons. (logic) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.166.255 ( talk) 02:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The official report from Malaysia basically says apparent intentional diversion as cause of the accident. That implies hijacking by either third party or crew (Malaysia says they feel it was not the crew, but nobody really feels Malaysia is being totally truthful about this accident). There is *no* evidence of fire or equip malfunction, but there is indeed radar tracking evidence that the aircraft was piloted on a diliberate path, with no apparent attempt to land due to malfunction, and no normal communications that would be expected for a malfunction. The Inmarsat satellite data shows the plane went to the Southern Indian Ocean most likely somewhere from 10 South to 40 South on Arc7. The debris of the crash, some three dozen pieces, are being found in Madagascar and Africa as expected for an aircraft crash in the Southern Indian Ocean.
So those are the basic facts. Based on that a (1) Hijacking is possible, (2) a crew Hijacking is possible, the (3) MH370-Captio.net theory is a possibly true hijack story that seems to be corroborated by rumors within Malaysia (although the rumors from Malaysia say the crew was diverting to COCOS or XMAS Islands).
An innocent cause such as unknown fire, unknown mechanical problem, or depessurization/hypoxia is still remotely possible, but not very likely based on the facts. There is zero supporting evidence. Admittedly some books have been written citing such events, but those books are not highly regarded by the experts.
Then we get into the wild conspiracy theories based on not-accepting the evidence. That includes the spoofing or electronic faking of satellite data to fake a flight path to the south, the Maldives theories, the shoot-down theories, Diego Garcia theories, northern flight route theories, alien black hole theories, Cambodia etc.
But what we should be communicating to the public is that the MH370 was a likely criminal act of hijacking, by the someone or some group, possibly including the crew. The introductory comments in this article are out-dated. I think now we do have facts to squelch just about everything except hijacking, unless somebody has some new evidence to disclose. I question the direction and need for this article because I see no merit or need to further confuse the public on MH370. TBILLT ( talk) 01:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)TBILLT
The sections "Satire about pilot reappearing" and "Pitbull and Shakira" are rather trivial. I don't see how this is in any way relevant or significant.
I would personally delete both - WP:DON'T PRESERVE - but I could abide merging the two together into a new section, titled "Satirical theories" or something. And perhaps fleshing out the pilot reappearance hoax if it was actually significant. Hughpac ( talk) 17:10, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Probably some of you know who this guy is. In a recent conversation he suggested the hypothesis that not Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah is the culprit of the disappearance, but the co-pilot, 27-year-old First Officer Fariq Abdul Hamid. He was hijacked MH370 plane in the same way as Andreas Lubitz Germanwings Flight 9525. Scandal with the his fiancé Nadira Ramli probably was the reason for his destructive behavior. Emil Enchev suggests that this woman be subjected to a Polygraph detector with only two question: 1. Did they have problems with her fiance Fariq Abdul Hamid before flight MH370? 2. Did she have sexual relations with the Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah?
Emil Enchev also suggest investigators to question any of the employees, who knew the flight attendants more closely - "Can one of the air hostesses have had sexual contacts with both pilots?" This may also to be the reason Fariq to close himself in the cockpit while Zaharie was in the toilet, and to take control over the plane.
So if he is right - this is the woman which was the reason for MH370 disappearance. And this woman with arrogance and without shame, is silencing what she knows about this case: http://satwinhans.blogspot.com/2009/11/female-pilot-gender-is-not-problem-in.html 79.100.143.139 ( talk) 14:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Theory of Norman Davies, Honeywell computer remote hijacking and hiding in Antarctica ice, must be present in this article because Davies is serious historian writing books like Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw. Davies told his theory in a published book, interviews, and in media listings of conspiracy theories of MH370 he is always listed: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12191656
https://www.theweek.co.uk/mh370/58037/mh370-conspiracy-theories-what-happened-to-the-missing-plane
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-magazine-interview-the-historian-norman-davies-on-conspiracy-theories-the-cold-war-and-his-own-spy-novel-past-8s86qwnpm?wgu=270525_54264_15765170745608_5154128985&wgexpiry=1584293074&utm_source=planit&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_content=22278 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teutonic Mouse ( talk • contribs) 06:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)