This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mainframe computer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
#History has a picture labelled An
IBM 704 mainframe (1964)
. There may still have been 704s in 1964, but any 704 or
IBM 709 still in operation would be considered to be a museum relic; more realistic machines for 1964 would be, e.g.,
Burroughs B5500,
GE 635,
Honeywell 800,
IBM 7074,
IBM 7080,
IBM 7094,
UNIVAC 1107.
There should be a photo for a 1950s mainframe, but the photo in IBM 704 has a more reasonable date, and photos of earlier mainframes, e.g., IBM 701, UNIVAC I, UNIVAC 1101, are available.
Would it be TMI to include a photo for each decade? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul ( talk) 17:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't the term "Big Iron" refers to the class of overall large commercial computers? [1] [2] Galzigler ( talk) 21:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
The introductory discussion of mainframes states that "Software upgrades usually require setting up the operating system or portions thereof, and are non-disruptive only when using virtualizing facilities such as IBM z/OS and Parallel Sysplex...", but z/OS does not provide this facility; it is IBM's Hypervisor OS, z/VM that provides it. [1] -- Zvmphile ( talk) 18:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
References
@
Guy Harris: a
recent edit added the template {{
Vague|date=June 2023|reason=Presumably that's IBM Z machines running z/OS or z/VSE or z/VM, rather than running the Linux later credited with "thousands" of vulnerabilities - or is Linux on Z better than Linux on x86?}}
without a talk link. I agree with the comment, and believe that the issue of security of software versus hardware should be discussed here. --
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (
talk)
14:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Saving time: 1) "mainframe" as the hand-wavy term that it is, is most strongly defined by the COMPANIES AND CUSTOMERS that CONTINUE to develop and purchase them, obviously in addition to the historical record. IBM, or their competitors are, in this case, the "authorities" whose notion of where to draw the lines is the reference. 2) As it stands, product offerings exist for HPC mainframes that can be easily referenced with face-palm obvious examples. Drug discovery (an industry that strangely depends almost as strongly on low-error, auditable computational power as the banking or securities industiries). There are at least a few mainframes marketed to drug discovery companies that are based on custom silicon, with custom software, and deployed within a custom operating system environment. These are miles short of "supercomputers", with the largest systems fractions of the size of the oldest LINPAC systems many steps away from "clusters" or any other term. THe same is true of contemporary non COTS based Neural Network hardware offerings, which *notoriously* include non-standard and completely bizarre custom software ("Wafer scale single chip" system anyone?). Mainframes are most importantly characterized and distinguished by being PRODUCT OFFERINGS and not just generalized schemes for enterprise scale systems. This is a hard reqirement. ALL mainframes are products developed by company and sold or deployed as either a discrete one-time purchase or service contract. Usage requirements are even more general than transaction-heavy. THey must be high-uptime with low error, auditable or with a comparable functionality, and come equipped with high levels of security. Those factors overshadow EVERYTHING else even compared to high speed or high computational power. You could walk away with that defintion: A commercial enterprise scale computer system that is designed to deliver highly reliable low error performance with high security, among other characeristics that combined toghether cannot be met with COTS based system architecture nor software 67.165.123.62 ( talk) 19:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
There's currently a little boring drama on Wiktionary about the origin of "mainframe", and whether it really refers to a solid cabinet, or something else. [6] I would really appreciate any evidence from experts, or very old nerds, regarding the etymology. Hit me up. Equinox ◑ 04:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
References