This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This information comes from events experienced by the writer and not from a peer reviewed journal.
What does this mean?! Is it the truth, or is it opinion? Should this be removed?? -- 69.203.73.148 ( talk) 03:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Currently it reads
"Because a patient may have a lucid interval, any head trauma is regarded as a medical emergency and receives emergency medical treatment even if the patient is conscious."
However, that is a fact that is patently false, as last shown when Natasha Richardson died. I propose the sentence is changed to something like this:
"Because a patient may have a lucid interval, any head trauma should be regarded as a medical emergency and emergency medical treatment should be administered even if the patient is conscious."
However, that makes the page sound like a medical handbook? Better options? Removing it altogether makes the page lose the real fact.
213.66.219.48 ( talk) 07:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lucid interval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lucid interval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)