This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Hmm, as a rule of thumb I tend to use CE in all my writing (not just here), for any date prior to 1500 regardless of the reiterations. I don't know why I just feel it gives context. Mind you, we could remove CE altogether since apparently I am an atheist for using it ;) (see
Talk:Spring and Autumn Annals).
Philg88 (
talk)
12:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)reply
It forces most visitors to follow CE link, but I think it's appropriate. I suggest letting it stand. 13:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the input and improvements to the page. I don't think "heroes" should be capitalized as WP normally only capitalizes the first word. If it were a discrete article it would be "Three heroes of the late Song Dynasty"
Philg88 (
talk)
12:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)reply