This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:46, August 2, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
You’re also a Missouri-synod Lutheran. Well, his comment in summary says he was bored. It’s a childish exaggeration and it’s not helpful to discerning whether the movie is worth watching or not. Therefore, it doesn’t add anything to the article.
The sleepwalker (
talk)
04:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
It seems to me that it's criticizing several things at once; the quality of the voice acting and narrative structure, in addition to the themes.
User:Blue Oceanman originally contributed the review, maybe he or she could provide some clarity as to why the source was originally chosen. There's not a lot of clear guidance from policies on what reviews to include, but I think
WP:Balance might lend itself towards the merits of having a critical review.
Ehler (
talk)
22:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply