Los Viagras was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 31, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 00:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I will be happy to review this article. I notice that the nominator already considers this to be a Good Article, so we should make it official. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I have read through the entry and have some concerns.
The entry is quite short, only a bit longer than most people's minimum criteria for a Start-class article. It is not that we require a certain length of GAs, but with very short entries there can be issues with GA criterion 3 (broad in its coverage). We see some of those issues here, as some of the main aspects of the organization are not discussed. Examples:
Right now, since so much information needs to be fleshed out in this entry, it makes the most sense to quick fail this nomination rather than continuing with a detailed review. I hope it comes back through GAN once these issues are addressed. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 01:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)