This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy. Neuroscience Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zshaw149, RaubieR, NinaLopergolo, Jpeloquin17, Lucinda Murray, Nrcsikai. Peer reviewers: Jhelbing, Khyatipatel98, MillerNick, Michael Newman29, Algarnihala1, Zcatalano44.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply

• Greek: διαμήκης σχισμή — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8235:7E00:A45C:93DB:A9E7:9A8B ( talk) 00:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

'Medial' and 'lateral' are correlates for parts of an organ on one side of the body, often a paired organ. 'Median' contrasts with 'paired', not with 'lateral'. 'Median' objects are not merely medial to lateral objects; they are unpaired, in the midline. Chjoaygame ( talk) 13:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply

As far as I can tell, a corpus callosotomy cannot be a pharmacologic treatment (for treating intractable epilepsy cases), as stated in the article at this time, since it is a SURGICAL procedure. If no one has information that it is in fact pharmacologic, I'll fix that entry by changing it to surgical. UnderEducatedGeezer ( talk) 09:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

In a human, how deep is the longitudinal fissure from the top of the brain down to the corpus callosum? UnderEducatedGeezer ( talk) 09:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The added content improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. The article is more complete. Strengths of the added content added include relevant material and well organization. The added content can be improved through better organization of "additional images." Khyatipatel98 ( talk) 16:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply

The tone is scientific, the article doesn't feel as if it directs me to a certain point of view. Strengths include good organization, relevant and helpful images and the content added is relevant and to the point. More length and detail as well as a better description of its relevance in the brain as a whole.  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
Michael Newman29 (
talk • 
contribs) 
18:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
reply