This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
It is amazing that this article was created in 2006 and has remained an unimproved stub since. How it has escaped a speedy deletion nomination is equally amazing. If we created (and allowed to remain) articles with only a brief mention in a reference we could have millions of additional articles. I am not actually a
deletionist but value their worth on Wikipedia.
This discussion timeline has expired without resolution. This stub could not be logically argued as worthy to occupy article space, by even the most ardent supporter, so I can not imagine a
bold moved would have been (or would be) contested. I will submit historical significance of the Lone Teepee (and a half) but it can be covered elsewhere. I have not looked to see if it would be better at the proposed merge location or
Battle of the Rosebud, where it receives no prominence, and where a "brief" mention in a reference will suffice for added content.
Otr500 (
talk)
12:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)reply