![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yohannes just moved the article from Song Dynasty (420-479) to Liu-Song Dynasty. In my opinion, neither the last title nor the current one is entirely satisfactory -- the former because it was unnecessarily cumbersome (this is unlike the situation with Jin Dynasty (265-420) in that the disambiguation solution already existed from how Chinese historians treated the matter), and the latter because the hyphen breaks the naming pattern of the other articles. (I personally would have preferred Southern Song Dynasty but I understand that that itself introduces ambiguity.) I am considering moving to Liu Song Dynasty, but I'd like to hear from others before I do so, lest that we end up removing double redirects twice. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be "Liu Song," without the hyphen, as it is now. That seems to be the convention. -- Apeman
I've always heard it called the "Former Song Dynasty". john k ( talk) 16:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I dont really know a lot about Chinese history but this article seemed to me to be very biased against the north, specifically with calling them barbarians. I dont know if this is historically correct term but to the casual ruler it seems biased if not racist, for instance, "This loss would eventually lead to the destruction of the southern regime, and resulted in North China languishing under a barbarian yoke for another 150 years." is that correct language or not cause it seems very biased to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gochisox ( talk • contribs) 06:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
There's a move request to decapitalize "dynasty" in the Chinese dynasty articles, as in Han Dynasty → Han dynasty. For more information and to give your input, see [4]. -- Cold Season ( talk) 18:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Liu Song dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)