This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
I decided to make this alphabetical, but was tempted to organize by Order per ICTV. The downside of organizing by Order would be that
Virus classification is not entirely settled, and the families are more likely to approximate scientific consensus. --
Scray (
talk)
23:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Could also organize this as a table, with sortable columns that include taxonomic classification including ICTV, Baltimore, and perhaps other systems. The overlap between this list and the
Virus classification page would then be substantial, though this list would be more comprehensive and interactive. --
Scray (
talk)
23:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)reply
@
Bervin61: Please see my comment
over there. I structured this page to reflect the ICTV, which IMHO it does more closely than the page you've created. Perhaps that page should redirect to here, or be renamed to more accurately reflect its structure? --
Scray (
talk)
14:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Scray: Agreed, though renaming doesn't really make sense to me. Baltimore or not, it is taxonomic, and is a list of viruses. The title isn't the problem, though changing the name of this list, or even merging it with the
ICTV page might make a lot of sense. As I said before, the other lists (
List of viruses &
List of genera of viruses) are only lists, and alphabetical at that. Having a similar list of families would make sense to me. I replied
over there as well, hoping to generate discussion on that page. I am still very new to WikiProject Viruses, and new to Wikipedia in general, so I'm interested in the opinion of all the members of the project (and users).
Bervin61 (
talk)
15:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Bervin recently updated the species list after
my request. The (can I call it) clutter, i.e. genera, families, orders, subtypes, synonyms, common names, defunct species, and viral diseases, were all removed, so only current ICTV species names remain. I think it's much better that that list is just a list of species, which complements the genus and family list articles.
ComfyKem (
talk)
22:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
All three lists are now up to date with the 2014 release, are alphabetical, and share nearly identical formatting. I plan to upload the scripts I used to generate the lists once I've removed the bugs. That way, the lists can easily be maintained in the future. I am also working on a script to generate legitimate articles for all redlinked genera and families, though that is a bit more complex, so it may be a while still.
Bervin61 (
talk)
12:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Wen I was watching a video wen it ended it said on phone a virus is in my phone