![]() | List of tallest buildings in Atlanta is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
The images featured in this list are missing ALT text that has recently become one of the points of the Featured list criteria. The list therefore fails 5b of the Featured list criteria and should have ALT text added to keep its status.-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 20:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
I checked the citation for this number and found the link claims there to be 258 high rises. However the real number is much smaller, as this list contains buildings that have been demolished, never built, or simply proposed. Anyone know a more reliable source? Mattximus ( talk) 15:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure it's appropriate to have a speculative, unsourced "proposed" section. These sections are not very encyclopedic, as many (most?) never end up built, or if they are built, modified from the proposed form. It runs afoul of Wikipedia:CRYSTAL, even if sources are found. This is a list of tallest buildings, not a list of imaginary/potential buildings. Mattximus ( talk) 19:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings in Atlanta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
This list is outdated. The current entries should be merged with the main list, and new ones added as needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.31.201.66 ( talk) 20:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
So I already went over some of the basic stuff in the edit summary. Additionally, {{ note}} and {{ note label}} were also deprecated and so I replaced with the current {{ efn-ua}}. A lot of this was just going through references, or finding new ones as many were dead, or did not support the data, i.e. failed verification. For just two examples see [1] and [2]. As I did so I updated the archived link or added one if it did not exist. Some data was changed by a small amount to match sources as I checked usually due to updates. I have not yet taken the time to update the main page photo with something newer, because I don't know a quick and easy way to make appropriately accurate image maps. I removed the bit about Sandy Springs having the tallest suburban buildings in the country, because the reference didn't support it. Whether or not it's still true largely depends on whether Sunny Isles Beach is classified as suburban or not, in any event the relevance to the article as a whole is low.
I also took the liberty of replacing Emporis. There was some discussion last year, and even earlier about its reliability due to accepting user-generated content, albeit with periodic review. I think it's in talk page or RSN archives now for the most-part, but the general conclusion as I recall was Marginally Reliable, and so OK in a pinch, but better sources preferred where available. However for the most part it did not make a difference as when I had to remove entries, neither the old, nor the new source supported them having an architectural height of more than 400 feet e.g. [3] [4] [5] [6].
I,m a little short on time now, I might be able to get back to this in a day or two so if you have any questions, or any other requests for improvement please ask, and I'll try to get back to you when I next have time, thanks.
𝒬 𝔔 22:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
P.S. Please allow a few days for replies, I can usually respond within the week.
Overall, as of January, 2020, there were no buildings over 400ft under construction and three proposed for construction in Atlanta. Seeing as this is a contentious issue I would prefer to discuss this first.
Overall, as of February, 2020, there were no buildings over 400ft under construction in Atlanta. However it seems kind of an awkward addition when the number is zero. Instead I'll just place a hidden note explaining that the reason the list lacks data on under-construction numbers is because there's nothing to provide information on. That way if you find yourself dealing with a WikiImp again who insists on tagging the article until an under-construction section is added you can just point to the hidden note and the consensus on this talk page. Feel free to ping me if you feel the article needs any other work, and are willing to wait a week or two for it to be done, or otherwise need technical help with something. Have a good one,
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tallest atlanta. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest atlanta until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards,
SONIC
678
16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)