This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Clearly, 2 people have started this list independently and they really need to be merged. Once merged, as indicated above, they need to be split. If the article is split then it needs to be done properly with templates to navigate between the various subpages.
Op47 (
talk)
16:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
They were not started independently of one another. The provincial NHSC lists have been around for some time, and the historic site indices were created in support of
Wiki Loves Monuments Canada. Not sure why they "they really need to be merged" given they are quite distinct. --
Skeezix1000 (
talk)
18:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)reply
If no one starts cleaning this up, I will gradually merge and separate this page by County in New Brunswick, then probably cities also.Hogie75 16:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
This definitely should be split by county (and probably city for Moncton and other cities with large numbers of listings). It (or the county lists) should also use {{coord}} for coordinates, so that {{GeoGroup}} can be used to produce maps showing the listings. (See American National Register of Historic Places listing pages.) Magic♪piano01:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Do not merge - they are two completely different types of lists. It also makes no sense to merge when this list is too long to begin with.
Skeezix1000 (
talk)
01:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)reply
To Skeezix1000 - The idea is to merge the list then SEPARATE the list by county to make it more readable, if you look at the articles they are almost identical in content. Some of the columns would be merged.09:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
They are not identical. Far from it. The list of NHSCs is part of a series of lists for every province and territory, with descriptions of each NHSC. This list of historical places is an index of links to the CRHP. You should divide this index by county, as has been done for the historic place lists of most other provinces, but that does not mean that there should not be a separate list of NHSCs at the provincial level. Having county indices of all historic places does not preclude having a provincial list of the main federal designation, like every other province and territory. --
Skeezix1000 (
talk)
12:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)reply
I agree with Skeezix1000, I dont think the merge is necessary. USA can live wth a list of the National Historic Landmark and the NRHP, event if a NHL is part of the NRHP. I also agreed for the list to be divided by conty, since it's already done in frwiki since one year. --
Fralambert (
talk)
02:49, 10 July 2013 (UTC)reply
It seems to me that a number of NHSCs are listed (or have elements contained within the site listed) on the Canadian Register, so merging the NHS lists with these would probably be redundant. (I don't know if Canadian NHSC designation confers automatic registry listing the way NHL designation does in the US.) Magic♪piano20:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)reply