This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I have two other Exorcists, Father Vincenzo (Chiesa San Martino ai Monti in Rome) and Francois-Marie Dermine that would be wonderful to add to this page. Their contact information is listed below. Also, may I add exorcists that are performing exorcisms in the United States. Some of them have websites and help people remotely or via email. I am wondering if we can also add an U.S. Exorcists Section. There are those residing in the U.S. that perform exorcisms. Since this page is a list of exorcists, it would be nice to see exorcists that are performing at this time included. Is this possible if I do the research for it? Also, how do I add a page section for new exorcists? (As in, link to a page for that particular exorcist)
CHIESA SAN MARTINO AI MONTI (THE CHURCH OF SAN MARINO AI MONTI) ITALY, ROME ROMAN CATHOLIC EXORCIST
LOCATED NEAR CHIESA SANTA MARIA MAGGIORE VIA LIBERIANA, 27
FRANCOIS-MARIE DERMINE PAROCCHIA S. DOMINICO VIA ZAPATA 3 60191 ANCONA TELEPHONE: O7120211 CELL: 3490723440 EMAIL: fm.dermine@tin.it
An exorcist who specializes in experiences that seem Universal in nature. I was recommended to him by Father Vincenzo, who maintained that Francois-Marie Dermine requires an introductory e-mail first. Please respect his wishes.
I found some interesting articles on this topic about Bobby Jindal. tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/bobby_jindals_dance_with_the_d.php cenlamar.wordpress.com/about-cenlamar/lamediawatch/bobby-jindal-the-story-they-dont-want-you-to-read/ newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?did=1294-jindal
I'm unsure if this article is actually noteworthy enough for inclusion on Wikipedia, given that it's little more than an arbitrary - and limited - list. However, I'm willing to help out with expanding the article if it would help with establishing some notability and provide some meaningful content. Please don't hesitate to ask if I can be of such help.
On a side note, it's good practice to sign your messages on talk pages such as this. You can do this by simply typing ~~~~ immediately after your message. Please also try not to include any email addresses in your messages, as they can be picked up by spam bots. Thanks. KaySL ( talk) 23:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
This list should not be deleted. It is of interest and is the only list of its kind online. Definate keep. Dwain ( talk) 21:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Dwain, I've decided not to press this issue any more. I've reworded the intro using your text from the Catholic section, so that the whole page has a more clear inclusion criterion. It may meet the Navigation criterion for lists now, but I suggest you buff it up with some reliable/independent sources discussing the matter. Dkriegls ( talk) 22:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
:After writing the immediate above, I see you've posted a response during the interim that I interpret as highly emotional. My intent was not to attack you, but to cite you for not addressing the
WP:Notability issues raised with the deletion tag, and making a unilateral decision to remove the prod with no discussion. This was not a matter of me disagreeing with your "reasoning", because you made no reference to notability. "of interest and is the only list of its kind online", did not address that issue. The issue still stands, but I believe that there are likely independent/third party sources out there that could justify this list. I suggest not attacking an editor back as a means to aggrieve a perceived attack, it only leads in a downward spiral. I was cited for the violations you mentioned, made aware of the policy, and have not violated it since being made aware of it. There are a lot of policies on Wikipedia and we both are likely to fall short of one or two again in the future.
Dkriegls (
talk)
23:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)